I Carly Subliminal Messgaes

"two states", one too many

two states proposed by Netanyahu, is one too many for the taste of French pacifists. In his speech of June 14, 2009, Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has formally offered the Palestinians a solution of two states for two peoples, repeating for the umpteenth time following all the leaders of Israel since its creation, the will of the Jewish state living in peace with all neighbors.
However, Netanyahu did not find favor in the eyes of some commentators hex: those for whom Israel is by its mere presence an obstacle to peace.
"unacceptable demands" to the tune of "disproportionate use of force"

In his speech, Netanyahu reaffirmed the deep historical connection between the Jewish people and the land of Israel and the sine qua not for peace: that the Jewish character of Israel is recognized by its neighbors.

other words, this false-Derche pretended to propose peace when in fact he wants his country is the homeland of his people alone! Racist, go! Worse even: Islamophobic!

No doubt our commentators, if they had held the microphone at the end of World War II, have found that ordinary Germans refuse to sit at a negotiating table with the Allies and would have regarded as outrageous as Gaulle requires that they recognize the defeated French in France ...

If they want to be Jews, then they are masochists, at least!

Another requirement of unconscionable Jewish leader: Palestinian state that he calls for should be demilitarized.

Demilitarized? Miss more than that! And how they will, then the courageous resistance to attack and destroy Israel? But it is not about war, we talk about a peace treaty!

Ah yes, yes! Why, then, our devotees hex they find "unacceptable requirement?

The Germans themselves at the end of the First World War, had no choice and when their neighbors have closed their eyes their rearmament, their respite was short-lived and their defeat even faster. Let

. Why

the same causes lead they have the same effect?

Today we are witnessing a flock of doves, the Pauvrepalestiniens, helpless against a powerful neighbor, Etatsionistelobbyjuif.

The first isolated on the international scene in the middle of just one billion three hundred million fellow fans of their case were genocide by the second (slightly less than thirteen million worldwide including six in Israel) point have seen their population multiplied by four since his arrival, there is a little over 40 years.

of myopia as an analytical tool

Myopia Zionist commentators today matched that of their elders who welcomed the Munich Agreement. Our contemporary media elites do not see the report, the less firm they lean against their conscience immaculate: they support the poor against the rich, the weak against the powerful, so good against evil.

Rich, what are the Israelis, of course: the Jews are all rich, it is not being anti-Semitic that convey this evidence. While many Israelis live below the poverty line.

But it serves them: yzavaikapas in sixty years of a life that began in poverty and marshes, match or exceed stale luminaries used to give lessons to the world from the rostrum of the UN. Unforgivable.

Rich are the Israelis and the poor are the Arabs in general and Palestinians in particular. Certainly, the Arab states possess 70% of the global black gold, but their leaders are not sharers, as it should of to show compassionate without ever seeking the origin of that poverty, failing to reverse the images d'Epinal, that of the usurer Yid wog like the poor.

Anyway, Netanyahu is a bastard who makes a right-wing political

the same way that the Jew is rich, Netanyahu is right. What about calling for a demilitarized Palestinian state, he places himself in the tradition of all the prime ministers who preceded him, whatever their political orientation (Yitzhak Rabin, Labor, Ehud Barak, Labor, Ariel Sharon, Likud and Kadima , and Ehud Olmert, Kadima) does not change the case.

That since the beginning of the Oslo process or near the demilitarization of an eventual Palestinian state is understood as the sine qua non for the success of the Israeli-Palestinian does not taken into account .

course, Netanyahu says he wants peace: Israelis and Palestinians "live freely, side by side in friendship and mutual respect. Every people has its flag, national anthem and his own government. Neither security nor threaten the survival of another, "he said. Fortunately

French commentators are not fooled!

What the Israelis want is a refusal of Palestinians and for that it imposes unacceptable conditions while pretending to take risks for peace.

Hence his request to the international community to take "clear commitments to ensure that in a future peace agreement, the territory controlled by the Palestinians be demilitarized."

We believe the statements of peace when Israel agrees to remove

The Israeli statements in favor of peace are legion and Netanyahu follows tradition: like Obama, he claims to desire "See the advent of a new era of reconciliation in our region. (...) The peace has always been that our people desire most ardently. Our prophets have given the world the vision of peace, we greet wishing us peace and our prayers end with the word peace. "

But if there really believed he would have already done, that peace, right? What do you mean "it takes two to make peace? Another excuse. You would not be a Zionist, sometimes?

And it is pure hypocrisy that he was ready to go "in Damascus, Riyadh, Beirut, everywhere, including in Jerusalem to meet with Arab leaders and discuss ways to end the conflict. He knows he will not get a single hit, the bastard!

But why, anyway? Why the gentle doves Pauvrepalestiniennes they systematically refuse proposals Sionistelobbyjuifs? They lose a great opportunity to confuse the enemy falcons. Too bad they do not want to take that risk ...

The historical link with the land of the Jews of Israel? And then what?

"The bond that unites the Jewish people and the land of Israel has existed for over 3500 years ... Our right to build our sovereign state here in the land of Israel, comes from a simple fact: it is the homeland of the Jewish people, this is our identity was forged. "

What nerve! 3500 years, it's gone past that is no longer reflect the era of the Internet and anti-Zionist parties. However, we must respect and compensation to a naqba aged 60.

Not to be confused with the Holocaust, which itself had ceased three years ago and should be denied or, if you want to go for a moderate, to disconnect the Middle East and supplications of the Mufti of Jerusalem to bury the Palestinian Jews in the beaches of this country ...

Benjamin Netanyahu has dared to say that the conflict would not happen until the Palestinians would not recognize Israel as a Jewish state. This minimum inalienable chair without discussion that any negotiations between any opponents yet is excessive when it comes to Jews.

Aware that his people with disabilities starts in world public opinion, Israeli Prime Minister has made a concession and unexpected unexpected: it did not require that recognition a precondition for talks, he called for their immediate resumption without preconditions.

Netanyahu to know anything about the comm '

should afford the advice of a true advisor, who is on the left to find favor in the eyes of French journalists, one that has proven itself with a Prime Minister, preferably French: it is a guarantee of quality, which is popular in Arab countries, it would help.

Hey, Pascal Boniface, he would not be available at this time?

Liliane Messika © Primo, June 25, 2009

Pool Compillers Results

Why we should ban the burqa in France

By Ivan Rioufol

The burqa was therefore invited to the castle. This full veil worn by Muslim women, has been condemned on Monday at Versailles, by the Head of State. "(She) will not be welcome," he said, to loud applause from Congress. Earlier, MPs, led by Andre Gerin (PC), had demanded a commission of inquiry into this phenomenon and its possible ban. But this outfit repellent, which encloses the woman is a symptom. He reveals, more seriously, the thrust of Islamism in France.
is a parliamentary fact-finding mission which was responsible, ultimately, identify what fashion choices still marginal. It must be said that the French Muslim Council had indicated its opposition to a commission of inquiry, accused of "stigmatize Islam and Muslims in France": a specious argument, inviting them to be quiet. But the burqa veil are like the signs of submission and rejection of the rules of the secular republic (1). Must resolve to be challenged by his hosts?

When Nicolas Sarkozy complained: "Our model of integration does more, "he refrains from digging causes. They deserve, however, the" overhaul "promised when the president talks about the economic crisis, social, ecological. For this other forgotten crisis, multicultural that there is far more destabilizing. Aristotle: "The absence of national community is a factor of civil war, as citizens do not share the same values of civilization" (2). France leaves next test, refusing to confront those who reject its values.
The many Muslim Democrats can feel secured to an ideology that seeks ultimately to subvert the nation. Sarkozy Gold speaks when he says: "In the Republic, the Islamic religion should be respected as much as other religions." However, this does not prohibit inquiry, beyond the burqa, on fundamentalism in the cities. The nation may lose close eye on neo-colonization process engaged in territories already lost. This evidence, although the power must be addressed, otherwise than by the small end of the telescope and fearing to offend.

Why should fear defeat the Islamists, who behave more and more, France, in occupied territory and coming to show their real face in Iran? The household would still roll back the Enlightenment Islam, which is struggling to consolidate his place. Our "old country", so named by Sarkozy, would he have lost the desire to defend themselves?




What say the people of Iran
France needs even less afraid to ban the burqa or niqab, and even to condemn the veil as sexual fantasy imposed by machismo, that radical Islam behind these marks of servitude is being done to disallow the Iranians themselves. They forced their Islamic Republic, economically ruined, to unveil his dictatorial basis. Neda, beautiful student killed by ball on Saturday during a demonstration in Tehran, became the symbol of theocratic oppression on behalf of its prohibitions, faking votes and draw the crowds. Certainly, we will not see scroll at Paris, the Islamo-leftists who protested yesterday against Hamas with the plight of Palestinians. These outraged then only support tyranny. But, Iran is a nation aspiring to democracy that opened the way for a secular modernity. The mullahs' regime, which begins to fracture from within, began to fall.

History will tell whether this turning point that begins in Iran has been inspired by the "contagion democratic "had hoped George W. Bush in the Middle East by liberating Iraq from its dictator, or by the hand of Barack H. Obama to Islam during his recent speech in Cairo. Both policies have probably contributed, in ways opposed to these effects they wanted. It was certainly reassuring to hear the President of the United States out of its weighty silences, reported here last week and approved by the sheepish Obamamania. On Tuesday, Obama has "strongly condemned the violent actions" in tribute to "courage" of protesters. Refusing to interfere in Iranian affairs, as it enjoins the West with reason, may not prohibit, the side of caution, the basic signs of support towards the Muslim people who says he wants to be free.


Short-termism
The question remains: Nicolas Sarkozy wants Does it really take him round the body the most serious problems, including the safeguarding of national cohesion? The promotion of Muslim women, republican and secular, remained timid in the reshuffle. The temptation is to dispel the French by pipolisation policy, illustrated by the arrival of Frederic Mitterrand Culture. When the head of state guarantees, Monday, speaking of economic and social: "The French model has its chance again," while the report of the Court of Auditors published the next day, put on alert on the huge deficits products, including the State welfare, will find this constant attraction to the short-termism, which has always rejected the most drastic decisions. When is ECT?




(1) See in this regard, the underside of the veil by Editions Response secular.
(2) I borrow this quote interesting to study David Mascré just devoted to the murder of Ilan Halimi in Barbarians City, published by Infinity. Aristotle's text, quoted by the author, said this at greater length: "The absence of national community is a factor of civil war, as citizens do not share the same values of civilisation.Une city is not formed in from people at random, and it needs time to coagulate. Therefore, among those who have accepted foreigners to found a city with them, and to integrate them into the city, most have experienced wars civilians. For example, the tyrants of Syracuse, having naturalized immigrants were subjected to riots. Citizens and foreigners have come to fight. "

How To Make A Cofee Table

Three pioneering initiatives in relations between Christians and Jews


These texts - very old but it is always useful to consult - are on the files of relations between Christians and Jews and will provide references to articles, more or less well informed, which bloom in recent years on this topic .

(Menahem Macina)

1. The Friends of Israel (Amici Israel) (1927-1928)
February 24, 1926, was created in Rome, a pious association of priests, called Opus Priestly Amici Israel, whose members devoted themselves to prayer for Jews and apostolate for their conversion. This initiative was not only of its kind, and she probably would never have attracted the attention of researchers if it had been abolished in an expeditious manner and seemingly arbitrary, since 1928, just two years after its official founding, despite the number and quality of its members, among whom were many members of the ecclesiastical hierarchy, as evidenced by the pro anno exacto Operis Status (status of the work for the past year), published in early 1927 by Officials work. It identifies eighteen cardinals, archbishops and bishops, two hundred and two thousand priests. Among the cardinals, we see familiar names: van Rossum, Gaspari, Faulhaber, etc.. The totality of the Bishops of the Netherlands had joined the Association as well as an impressive number of bishops from around the world. The patronage committee was chaired by the Benedictine Abbot Dom Benedict Goriador Bishop Vanneuville was vice-president, and Father Van Asseldonk, Attorney General, in Rome, the College of Crosier, secretary; among members this Committee were the Fathers Garrigou-Lagrange, a Dominican, Damien, the Crosier Order, Himmelreich the Franciscan Order, and Dom Chuard, canon regular of the Immaculate Conception. At the time of dissolution (March 1928), had joined the Association: nineteen cardinals (which Merry del Val, van Rossum, Früwirth, Pompili and Perosi, members of the Holy Office), nearly three hundred bishops and about 3,000 priests.

We will not address here the circumstances or reasons for the brutal suppression of Amici, but it will not need to list the principles advocated by the movement. Indeed, the "new look" before the letter (and quite revolutionary for its time), it focused on the Jewish people, announced more than twenty years in advance, "the teaching of esteem," which Jules Isaac was a pioneer, and which found its first expression in the "Ten Points Seelisberg "before becoming the norm in today's Church. The twelve following were the charter of the report with Christian Jews, as Amici dreamed of acclimatizing in Christendom



"Whether we refrain from talking


œ the deicide people;

· of City deicide;

· conversion of the Jews - we rather say "return", or "way";

œ the convertibility of the Jewish people;

· the incredible things that are told about Jews, especially " ritual crime ";

· to speak without respect for their ceremonies;

œ to exaggerate or generalize a particular case;

· to express anti-Semitic terms.



But we said


· the prerogative of divine love which Israel enjoys;

· the sign that love sublime in the incarnation of Christ and its mission;

· the permanence of this love best: its increase due to the death of Christ;

· the testimony, the proof of that love, in the conduct of the Apostles. "


2. The 'Ten Points' Seelisberg (1947)


preceded by the Meeting of the Savoy Hotel (1943) and the Oxford Conference (1946), a "special international conference to combat anti-Semitism" meets from July 30 August 5, 1947 at Seelisberg (Switzerland) under the auspices of the International Council of Christians and Jews. " It approved a series of assumptions about the Christian religious education. Moved by the suffering of the Jewish people, the Commission, in a frank and cordial cooperation between Jewish and Christian members, admitted that some inaccurate conceptions theological perspective, and some presentations of false gospels, quite contrary to the spirit of Christianity had contributed to the development of anti-Semitism.

Jules Isaac had prepared a first series of theses, which was the basis for the development by the Christian members Commission and after consulting the Jewish participants in the Conference, a "Call to the churches," which was widely distributed (but not edited). It is difficult to assess the impact, but it is widely estimated that, in conjunction with the book by J. Isaac, Jesus and Israel, which appeared the following year, the paper exerted a significant influence on a number of Christian conscience, even if it did not receive official approval of religious Christians. Until Vatican II, it was the only international document to which Christians could possibly refer, but few of them knew him.



"We have just witnessed an explosion of anti-Semitism that led to the persecution and extermination of millions of Jews living among Christians.

Despite the disaster that befell the persecuted and the persecutors, disaster makes us measure the anguished gravity and urgency of the Jewish problem, antisemitism has not only lost none of its force, but threatens to reach parts of an increasingly broad range of humanity, poisoning the minds of Christians and lead them into error serious consequences.

Undoubtedly the Christian churches have said they often anti-Christian character of antisemitism, but we note with dismay that two thousand years of preaching the Gospel of Love is not enough to prevent an outbreak among Christians, various forms of hatred and contempt towards the people of Jesus.

This would be impossible if all Christians were faithful to the message of Jesus Christ on God's mercy and love of neighbor. But this loyalty must have the desire to avoid any far-sighted presentation or any conception of the Christian message that would encourage anti-Semitism in any form whatsoever. We must recognize that, unfortunately, this will alert has often failed.

We therefore appeal to the churches to draw their attention to this alarming situation. We firmly hope that they will have to heart to tell their followers how to exclude any animosity towards Jews, which could arise from presentations and misconceptions, inaccurate or misleading in teaching and preaching Christian doctrine and how the contrary promote brotherly love towards the people of the Old Covenant, so sorely tried. Nothing, it seems, can not be more calculated to lead to this happy result that increased emphasis on the following:



1. Recall that the same living God who speaks to us all in the Old and New Testament.

2. Remember that Jesus was born of a Jewish mother, race of David and the people of Israel, and his eternal love and forgiveness embraces his own people and the world.

3. Remember that the first disciples, the apostles and the first martyrs were Jews.

4. Recall that the basic tenet of Christianity, that of love of God and neighbor, already enacted in the Old Testament and confirmed by Jesus, Christians and Jews requires in all human relations, without exception.

5. Not to demean the biblical Judaism or post-biblical in order to exalt Christianity.

6. Avoid using the word "Jews" in the exclusive sense of "enemies of Jesus" or the phrase "enemies of Jesus" to refer to the entire Jewish people.

7. Avoid presenting the Passion so that the blame for the killing of Jesus upon all the Jews or the Jews alone. Indeed, they are not all Jews who called the death of Jesus. They are not Jews alone who are responsible for the Cross, that saves us all, shows that it is because of our sins to all that Christ died.

Remind all parents and Christian educators the grave responsibility they face due to present the Gospel and especially the passion narrative in a simplistic way. Indeed, they may thus inspire, whether they like it or not, the aversion in the consciousness or subconsciousness of their children or listeners. Psychologically speaking, in simple souls, driven by a burning love and deep compassion for the crucified Saviour, the horror they naturally feel towards the persecutors of Jesus in turn easily generalized hatred of the Jews of all times, including today.

8. Avoid referring to the scriptural curses and cries of a mob: "Let his blood be on us and on our children," reminiscent of the cry that can not prevail against the infinitely more powerful prayer of Jesus: "Father, forgive them, for they know not what they do. "

9. Avoid promoting the superstitious notion that the Jewish people are reprobate, accursed, reserved for a destiny of suffering.

10. Avoid talking about Jews as if they were not the first members of the Church.



In practice, we would suggest:



œ to introduce or develop in school and extra-curricular at all levels, a more objective and thorough history Biblical and post-biblical Jewish people and the Jewish problem;

œ to promote in particular the dissemination of this knowledge through publications tailored to different Christian circles;

· ensure correct in Christian publications, especially in the textbooks, all that oppose the principles outlined above.



We put our joint efforts under the banner of the words of St. Paul: "They are beloved because of their fathers, for the gifts and calling of God are without repentance." (Rom 11, 28 -29).









3.'s theses Bad Schwalbach (May 1950)



In May 1950, in Bad Schwalbach (Germany), a group of Protestant and Catholic theologians (including Freudenberg and Pastor Karl Thieme) met to clarify the biblical foundations of Ten Points Seelisberg. The text of these had previously been subjected to various associations Judeo-Christian. Theses Schwalbach received in July 1950, approval of the Catholic hierarchy, in the person of the Bishop of Freiburg im Breisgau. Less known than the points Seelisberg, who served as the Charter of Friendship Associations in the various Judeo-Christian theories of Bad Schwalbach, supplementing them, are of great importance because they provide the basis for reform of the Christian teaching, as demanded by the conference Seelisberg. Note that this document already contains the essence of what appear in official documents relating to the post "new look" that the Church would become the Jewish people.



1. One and the same God speaks to all men in the Old and New Testament. This one God is the God of Abraham, Isaac and Jacob, Moses and the Prophets. If we Christians do not believe in one God we worship a false god, even if we call the Father of Jesus Christ: this was already the heresy of Marcion in the 1st century.


2. Jesus was born of Israel, a Jewish mother, race of David. For him, the son of David, the Anointed of God, we share to redemption, bound for Israel for the coming of the messiah, and already promised to all other peoples in the blessing given to Abraham. If it is safe for our faith in the person of Jesus of Nazareth is the Savior who came to perform any promise of salvation, it is nevertheless certain that we are still waiting for the day to come when we contemplate the manifestation of this accomplishment.


3. The church, founded by the Holy Spirit, is composed of Jews and Gentiles in Christ reconciled and combined to form the new People of God. We must never forget that part Much of this church is made up of Jews and the apostles and the first witnesses of Jesus were Jews.


4. The basic tenet of Christianity, that of love of God and neighbor, already enacted in the Old Testament and confirmed by Jesus Christ, thus forcing Jews and Christians in all human relationships without exception.


5. Because the Jew as a Christian (Mark 12, 33 ff.; Rom 13: 8-10), is subject to the same law of love without limits is a sin to belittle proudly Jews of the time Biblical and post-biblical against Christians, is to misunderstand and the Gospel as the fulfillment of the Act.


6. It is not consistent with Scripture to equate "the Jews" to "enemies of Jesus," for precisely the Evangelist John refers to which this use - even where he seems to identify one another does not refer in speaking of "Jewish", the entire Jewish people, not even in Jerusalem (7, 12s), but the majority of influential political and religious leaders to this point (7, 48 et seq.) Therefore, speaking of the Passion, we must not fail to remind these "crowds" who wept over Jesus (Lk 23, 27) and that after his crucifixion "they went home beating their breasts" (Lk 23, 48).


7. Above all, it is neither biblical nor Christian to watch and to present the Passion of Christ, to whom we owe our salvation, in a partial light, attributing the fault of men determined historically or that of a specific people. As far as men can judge, and based on data from the New Testament, one can clearly distinguish among the contemporaries of Jesus, three attitudes "guilty" to varying degrees:

a) The conduct of some relatively few who, in a manner or another, were involved in the crucifixion, from the instigators of the death of Christ, driven by political ambition and religious fanaticism, to officials or scholars who have failed through cowardice.

b) The conduct of the multitude who could not bring himself to believe in the Resurrection of Jesus as foretold by the apostles and connected to the scriptural evidence of his Messiahship, and instead allowed himself be convinced by the arguments that seemed doomed to lag death for blasphemy and uplift of the people (cf. Acts 17, 11, but Luke 5, 39!).

c) The hatred of a great number who pursued and slandered the disciples of Jesus (Acts 13, 50, 14, 19, 17, 5ß, 18, 12ss). We should not forget that, since the Middle Ages, with Maimonides, the Jewish authorities increasingly changing their attitude and, unlike their predecessors, recognize the pagan baptized as a worshiper of the true God. In all this, we Christians must never forget that we pay much more if convicted, despite the graces received, we engage in social and political messianism and crucify, again, the Lord, necessarily and finally in its members, we simply confess lips Revelation of God instead of consenting to the reproach of the cross as the Lord died and rose for us has the right to demand our whole lives, we should rather pay attention to the warnings and promises he has given us as signs whereas between 1933 and 1945, for the first time in history, Jews and Christians were persecuted all, we refuse to respect the sincere believer who does not share our faith.


8. The meaning of the crucifixion of Christ in God's covenant with Israel is a mystery hidden within God's steadfast loyalty to his people. And even the central part of the epistle to the Romans (Ch. 9-11) reveals to us in its main features by referring to. Like everywhere else in the history of this unique people, there can be no question here of a curse, but rather a blessing that God wants his people to give eventually, and with him, to all peoples. Alone - according to Genesis 12, 3 - it excludes those who through carelessness or maliciously violates this covenant promising. The Christian remembers also the word of Christ on the cross: "Father, forgive them for they know not what they do!" The cry of a mob: "Let his blood be on us and on our children "must be shot by us in prayer and express that blood saves finally those for whom it was first poured. We will never have to cry abuse to present the shedding of Jewish blood as a kind of just punishment, especially since early Christianity was venerated with particular fervor of the martyrs of Jewish origin.



9. The only New Testament passage where the word "discharge" in relation to the fate of the Jews is immediately opposite the "assumption" future of the people of the old covenant in the new and final Covenant, in Rm 11, 15, must be the standard interpretation of all the claims the New Testament for rejection. It is not consistent with the revelation only to announce the provisional aspect of the dual sentence given by the entire Bible, without evoking the same time, the other aspect - the final - which will remove it by surpassing. Yes the Jews to Jesus is promised by God as the final word on their history and that promise is the guarantee of his yes to the Jews. This must be the last word of Christian preaching




--------------------


Published June 24, 2009, by M . Macina site upjf.org

How Many Btus Is A Car Radiator

Netanyahu begins European tour

Prime Minister, Binyamin Netanyahu, starts a three-day visit through Europe. Program, Italy, France and Holland. This is the first time since his election last April that the head of the Israeli government goes to the Old Continent. It is awaited for by the leaders of the European Union. On the agenda of discussions, negotiations for peace with the Palestinians, Syria and the Golan Heights, Iran and its manifestations. First stage of the tour leader of the coalition, Italy. Bibi met with Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi. Before that, he gave an interview on Italian television. The Prime Minister conveyed a welcome message to his European friends. "Anyone who deals only with construction in the settlements is wasting his time. Reduce the problem between Israelis and Palestinians to a case of colonies hinders the peace process. " Netanyahu reacted to the Italian Minister of Foreign Affairs Franco Frattini expressed "to freeze settlement building."
The next course is in Paris. The leader of the Israeli government must meet the president, Nicolas Sarkozy. George Mitchell, the emissary U.S. Middle East, will join the discussion between the two men. They discuss their divergent views on the peace settlement. Israeli Prime Minister will present their project's "economic and commercial assistance to the Palestinian people." An idea dear to the Prime Minister of Israel. The French head of state will discuss the issue of Jerusalem. France is for sharing. Netanyahu reiterated in his speech at Bar Ilan University that "Jerusalem is indivisible and will forever be the capital of Israel." The Shalit issue will be discussed for sure. Iran and demonstrations are also scheduled discussions.
The head of the Israeli government will make a brief visit to Holland and discuss with the Minister of Foreign Affairs, Maxime Frahakhen. The two men will discuss the peace proposal of President Bashar Al-Assad. We know that Netanyahu is unwilling to cede any ground on this issue.

Ultimately, the prime minister is known in hostile terrain. He heard voices and Israel's position right out of the plane. He repeated his message: "Israel wants peace but not under any condition."


by Jonathan Serero

http://www.actu.co.il/2009/06/netanyahou-entame-sa-tournee-europeenne/

Dark Stool At 36 Weeks

Counter-figures and protagonists of the Iranian political crisis

Jean-Sylvestre Mongrenier brush with the portrait of talented actors prncipaux the Iranian crisis.
Read the following lines can understand better the challenges of the current crisis.

Mossadegh, the untouchable

If we are to believe the dogma, partly backed by President Obama in his speech in Cairo (June 3, 2009), the CIA had removed itself a premier national democratic elected and supported by all Iranians, and in the name of oil interests of the United States.

This fact justifies a posteriori the large reserve which the White House has shown in the present political crisis in Iran. But we must look more closely.
Born in 1880, Mohammed Mossadegh was the son of a wealthy landowner and a parent of Qajar princess, the imperial dynasty preceding the seizure of power by Reza Khan (founder of the Pahlavi dynasty, it takes power 1925). Mossadegh was educated in Europe and obtained a doctorate in law from the University of Neuchâtel (Dr. Mossadegh). He was then governor of the province (Fars, Azerbaijan), Minister of Finance (1921) and Minister of Foreign Affairs (1923-1925). Mossadegh opposes the takeover Reza Pahlavi and he was temporarily imprisoned.

In 1943, Mossadegh was elected National Front (the actual number of voters then not more than one tenth of the population), a small political party that is allied with the Tudeh, the Iranian Communist Party.

Mossadegh arises champion a national policy on the issue of oil.

In 1994 and 1947, he led the failed Soviet (requirements for oil concessions) and against the interests of the Anglo-Iranian Oil Company (AIOC) was founded in 1909.

When the Iranian prime minister, General Razmara is assassinated by a member of the organization Fadayan-e Eslam (led by Navvab Safavi, the precursor of political Islam and a metro station in Tehran bears his name), doors are open to him. He headed the government in April 1951.

With the support of the Tudeh Party but also Shi'ite (led by Ayatollah Kashani), Mossadeq decided to nationalize the oil and thereby trigger a major international crisis with multiple dimensions.

The AIOC has the conflict before the International Court of Justice at The Hague; technicians British were expelled and international markets close to Iranian oil, is that Tehran could not even extract and export its own efforts.

Without oil revenues, the country slides into economic crisis and conflicts Mossadegh with the Shah (Mohammad Reza succeeded his father in 1941, who abdicated under pressure from the British and the Soviets who then occupy Iran) .

As part of their overall strategy of containment, the United States supported the nationalism of the Third World and therefore the will of Mossadegh nationalized the oil, provided that the shapes and international law (compensation owners, etc.) are respected; Washington is not on the same line as London strongly supports the British economic interests in Iran as in the entire Middle East.

However, their mission conciliation fails and the conflict between London and Tehran is running to the economic attrition. On site, the political situation deteriorates. The Tudeh practice of street unrest, the Shah was forced to start and the Shiite party loyal to the monarchical principle, dissents from Mossadegh.

Mossadegh sought to exploit the Communists (Tudeh) and the fear of the USSR, to put pressure on the Americans who maintain their economic aid. An additional request for assistance is extended in May 1953, Washington must stop thinking of Mossadegh as a bulwark against communism. The Prime Minister responded by concentrating more power.

Therefore, we see the convergence of political interests of the Shah, the army (loyal to the monarch) and the religious party, the United States playing the facilitators. The main architect of the coup, August 19, 1953, is General Zahedi, a member of the Senate and leader of the monarchist opposition. In fact, the United States plays a key role, the CIA funding and organizing the coup (Operation Ajax).

August 19, religious leaders and leaders of the bazaar organized a demonstration monarchy and the army joined the movement and took control of the capital. Mossadegh was arrested, Zahedi became head of the government and the Shah returned to Iran. The former prime minister was tried and sentenced to three years in prison. Released in 1956, he retired from public life and died in 1967.

Since this serious domestic crisis and international Mossadegh as a pioneer and leader of Nasserism third world victim of American imperialism and is also a victim of blackmail his suicide and gambling that leads to the ambiguous Tudeh. Finally, we must not neglect the proper in the Iranian coup of August 19, 1953.

Khomeini, founder of the Islamic Republic Ayatollah Khomeini

is the winner of the 1979 revolution and the founder of the Islamic Republic. Born in 1902 in Khomein, near Tehran, he studied and taught theology in Qom, one of the holiest sites in Shia Islam. Ruhollah Khomeini against the Shah stands and the policy of forced modernization of the country, Middle Eastern variant of "enlightened despotism" inaugurated by Reza Pahlavi's father and, simultaneously, by Mustafa Kemal in Turkey.

Arrested in 1963 he was exiled and went first to Turkey, then Iraq, before joining France in 1978, while the Iranian political situation deteriorates. Installed Neauphle-le-Chateau, he enjoys the convenience of the authorities, who think they have a trump card for the post-Pahlavi, and his followers flood Iran with tapes of recorded violent preaching on French soil.

The Shah went into exile, Ayatollah Khomeini returned to Tehran on 1 February 1979, where he triumphantly allowed. He announced the same day the constitution of an Islamic Revolutionary Council, the first step towards the establishment of an Islamic Republic (March 1979).

In this new politico-religious regime, Ayatollah Khomeini performs the function of the Supreme Leader of Islamic Revolution. First character of the country, appointed for life by the Assembly of Experts, it has the upper hand in affairs domestic and foreign policies. Sometimes
presented in the West under the guise of a peaceful kind of wise (a Muslim Gandhi), Khomeini revealed his true face for all to see (though). Islamic Courts purify the state apparatus and army are bloody purges and go well beyond the inevitable settling of scores inherent in this type of situation.

November 4, 1979 hostage taking of U.S. embassy (52 diplomats held 444 days) embodies the violently anti-Western orientation of the Islamic regime, Ayatollah Khomeini refers to a "second revolution". When Saddam Hussein's troops attacked the "enemy Persian, September 17, 1980, the Supreme leverages the war between Iran and Iraq (1980-1988) to eliminate the sources of opposition and strengthen the Islamist grip on the country.

Ayatollah Khomeini died in 1989 and the followers of comparative evoke the "Thermidor" of the Islamic Revolution. Two decades have passed since ...

Ali Khamenei, Supreme Leader of Islamic Revolution

In the current political crisis in Iran, Supreme Leader of Islamic Revolution outset supported the outgoing president, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, revealing strong solidarity between the two men (a fact overlooked by many experts).

Born in 1939 in Mashhad (one of the shrines of Shiite Islam, east of Iran), Ali Khamenei was a student of Ayatollah Khomeini that he follows in his opposition to the imperial monarchy of Mohammed Pahlavi, he is also jailed several times during this period.

In 1979 he joined the Council of Islamic Revolution and is very committed to the implementation of the plan; Ali Khamenei helped create the Islamic Republic Party and runs a time the Guardians of the Revolution, iron lance ideological regime.

In 1981, he survived an attack that takes away one arm. He was elected president of Republic, with the approval of Ayatollah Khomeini (Mousavi is the Prime Minister); Iran is at war against Iraq.

the death of Khomeini in 1989, Ali Khamenei appointed Supreme Leader by the Assembly of Experts, not without controversy. Critics said Ali Khamenei would not have any theological qualifications required, and in 1979 he was qu'hodjatoleslam, making it a religious junior.

Once in place in June 1989, he broadened the scope of its functions and strengthen the bonds forged over the years with the Revolutionary Guards and intelligence services of the scheme, so of "deep state". Ali Khamenei is haunted by the "western cultural contamination" and a form of Iranian "velvet revolution".

From 1997 to 2004, he opposed in many respects to the timid political reforms advocated by Mohammad Khatami, who succeeded to the presidency of Hashemi Rafsanjani (1989-1997), himself a supporter of a limited opening to the West.

On 12 June 2009, the Supreme Leader immediately takes up the cause of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and he solemnly renews its support on 19 June. The turn taken by this serious political crisis and the bloody repression have already invalidated the scenario of a "velvet revolution".

In this respect, the wishes are fulfilled Ali Khamenei, Iran's Islamist is not Hungary or Czechoslovakia post-Cold War.

Ahmadinejad challenged President and Leader of the Islamic-Justicialist

Reelected in circumstances that we know (various information confirms the initial feeling of a huge fraud), the President of the Islamic Republic is the epitome of the "engineer Islamist, secular from the popular classes (a blacksmith father) who attempts a new synthesis politico-Islamic radical more the regime that emerged from the revolution of 1979.

Gamsar Born in 1956 in a small town a hundred miles from Tehran, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad belongs to the generation that forged his political identity in the context of the Iran-Iraq war than in years of struggle against the regime the Shah.

He trained as an engineer as many of these activists in the Arab-Muslim world, constitute the backbone of radical Islamism, and obtained his doctorate in 1987 (he already holds public office).

Elected Mayor of Tehran 2003 he became president of the Islamic Republic in 2005. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad supported the Pasdaran (the "Revolutionary Guards") and the Basij (the "Focused") that represent the core of the plan and recruit in the popular media.

These structures are central to the populist and clientelist system, with oil revenues as a "justice", of which Ahmadinejad is the incarnation (see the financial role of various foundations controlled by the Pasdaran and policies assistantship the benefit of the lower classes).

So his speech he connotations "fight classes, particularly when it threatens to "cut hands" of "profiteering" threat addressed in terms scarcely veiled Hashemi Rafsanjani - Former President of the Islamic Republic (1989-1997) and defeated rival in 2005 - deemed be one of the richest men of Iran (his daughter was arrested June 21, 2009 and then released, ed Primo). This dimension

"populist" (a kind of Islamo-Bolshevism?) Should not obscure the close connections with Ahmadinejad's part of the clergy, the support shown by the Supreme Leader, and the propensity of the character to a form of political millenarianism.

Iranian President expects the near return of the Twelfth Imam, a descendant and representative of the Prophet, who died in 873 (see his speech at the UN in September 2005 and the speech delivered November 16, 2005 at the meeting of imams Friday ).

Internationally, this religio-political orientation is reflected in a speech denier and anti-Jewish violent diatribes against Israel and the United States and an anti-Western stance, Ahmadinejad sought to take the head a pan-Islamic front that would expand the Shiite axis and it is forging links with countries hostile to the West (Russia, China, Venezuela).

He wants to be the leader of a "third revolution", described by observers of Islamo-Justicialist.

Mousavi, leader of a not found "color revolution" Islamic Revolutionary

the first hour, Mir Hossein Moussavi is an "old horse" of return, long absent from the political scene. Born in 1941 in the Azeri part of Iran, he initially appears to represent a form of Islamism third world and has a recent craze among classes urban and community supporters of the opening.

Given his political history, one must wonder if the character is not overtaken by the dynamics of events and transformed into a totem, in Freudian terms, a large proportion of the population.

Many people, tired of the psycho-cultural confinement, also suffer pervasive effects of the isolation of Iran internationally and economic failure of Ahmadinejad.

But we must remember that Mousavi is a man of the seraglio committed to the very origins of the Islamic Revolution. He is a founder of the Republic Party Islamic and became the political secretary, and therefore supported the Ayatollah Khomeini during the revolutionary events.

Mousavi was then foreign minister before being appointed prime minister from 1981 to 1989, during the years of war against Iraq (Ali Khamenei was president of the Islamic Republic). He is credited with a decisive role in the survival of the Islamic Iran and functioning economy. If

then disappears from the scene, Mousavi was one of the main advisers of Presidents Rafsanjani and Khatami, who now support it. The Islamic third world now looks "reformer", exposed to the axis revolutionism Khamenei-Ahmadinejad.

should see more precisely in the person of Mousavi a "national-Islamist", mindful of the fundamental interests of his country reserved for the provocations of Ahmadinejad who have only reinforced the hostility towards the Iran.

We know he intends to continue Iran's nuclear program, like most of the political class, and do not see him as a "martingale" to resolve all disputes between Iran and the West. His hypothetical

access to the presidency, however, could facilitate a negotiation between State and State-centered interests well defined and circumscribed. Mousavi seems to have burned his ships and it will be difficult to avoid, for himself as for his movement, the consequences of a bloody crackdown.


Jean-Sylvestre Mongrenier
Thomas More Institute

Place To Celebrate Birthday At Night In Bangalore

The time has arrived, as Bibi says, the Palestinians deal with the Palestinians

Deborah

fact I read a lot of analysis on the speech of Bibi Netanyahu last week, but tests really interesting person has identified a very significant portion of the speech. Bibi deserves a standing ovation for the first time an Israeli prime minister has clarified something that should be logical and obvious but which seems not to be for the rest of the world, especially Arabs, Americans, Europeans and many leftist Israelis: Israel should not take charge of 1948 refugees, many of whom are already dead, but take care of their offspring. Ridiculous, really ridiculous.

For years no one has spoken of the Jews expelled from Arab countries where they lived for more a thousand years, are the forgotten refugees only because the expulsion of the Jews has always been a normal thing, a kind of popular sport in Arab countries and Europe for not less than 20 centuries. Who cares? They are Jews, while Jews out! Refugees, Jewish refugees? But they are full of money!
How full of money, and working like crazy! Just arrived somewhere, they go to work but it does not deprive them being refugees of 2000 years. In the end they took over Israel, they worked, they died of malaria, they worked with the rifle to his shoulder and children in shelters because millions of Arabs wanted to kill them.

They welcomed their fellow Jews expelled from Morocco, Tunisia, Egypt, Libya, Yemen and again and again and again and they continued to work in the mud, planting eucalyptus trees to clean up the marsh . They worked, they fought enemies who wanted to destroy them and instead of giving asylum to their Arab brothers who were fleeing war, were imprisoned in camps for 60 years. 60, no nation has never been maintained for so long, no nation has ever had some dignity. None.

And now we are asked to take them to Israel! Well no, mind you, these are your brothers, we, we dealt with us without asking you. We've not asked anything, distinguished Arabs for decades, not even a small brick house that you're Jewish appropriate, not even a penny of wealth and jewels you've stolen.

Perhaps the time has come for us also to begin to make complaints!

Perhaps the time has come, says Bibi as for the Palestinians to deal with the Palestinians.

Perhaps the time has finally arrived they grow, let it grow, let them work, give them responsibility.

is the only way to do [major] people.

The world has always treated the Palestinians as the poor unable to work impaired, unable to dignity, only willing to whine and complain.

Today, however, that Iran is to turn our eyes toward the young men and young girls in Tehran who are killed by the police to Ahmadinejad and those damn priests, the Ayatollahs. Tehran's youth die and we are glued to our television set to participate in their despair as we can. What hurts is that these young men and girls are dying in the name of someone who is no better than Ahmadinejad.

Mousavi is not a moderate!

Journalists, use the exact words! You can not talk of Avigdor Lieberman as a fascist because he speaks in the interest of Israel and say that as Mousavi Khomeini was a moderate!

Mousavi is a fascist.

Mousavi was prime minister when his government in Iran sent 100,000 children cleaning minefields, killing them all.

Mousavi killed thousands of dissidents, women and homosexuals and young Iranians are now getting killed for this monster. How is this possible?

When I see them my heart is crying, they are brave, proud, full of dignity, but where will he lead them? Where is the rest of the world? Where is Barack Obama? They're all asleep, to wake them up as the joke says, and as I've written so many times you need someone to say that Israel has built a home in the territories.

Where are you? ? ?

Today a young girl, a beautiful young girl in jean is dead in the street in the heart affected by the policy of the priests, we have all seen to have a stomach ache, headache.

Where are you all cowards of the world?

Man, where are you? Why nobody helps these young men and young girls there to Tehran? Why let yourself die for nothing?

I look, my heart cries and I think other young people, many of whom are still in prison, some tortured, others killed, while others have fled their homeland and I remember their words :

"For the welfare of my people, for the future of my country, I will use my youth
against dictatorship.
I'll bleed my heart but I will not go to Tiananmen! "Tiananmen

fell, Tehran will fall, the courageous young will die.

Man where are you? Why do not you defend these young people
Borah Done - adapted by dg

Tuesday, June 23, 2009


E 'arrivato it momento che, come dice Bibi dei palestinesi if i occupino palestinesi, da Israele, Deborah Done

Fungus Bearded Dragon

SOS: Genocide * VITRY

the midget TEHRAN

Before the bloody repression that exists in Tehran and the blackout imposed by the newspaper "Republic" of the mullahs, is expected to unprecedented protests in the streets of major French cities. Undoubtedly, the PCF and friends of Jean-Luc Melenchon, the NPA of Besancenot, MRAP Mouloud Aounit, the Party of Muslims of France Mohamed Latrèche, deceitful slogans and refine their banners.

It denounces, for sure, the massacre of its own people by the Iranian regime, the outrage committed against the fundamental freedoms which legitimately aspires the Persian people.
Maybe it does go to use the terms "genocide" or "militia of shame". It provides an innumerable between Bastille and Republic as soon as the watchword of the mobilization will be launched as was done during the events in Gaza in December and January.

run quickly on the websites of these organizations and see what it prepares ...

Site Zip: Press the NPA: "No to the coming of Netanyahu in France. In a speech June 14, the Israeli Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu has once again expressed the contempt officials Zionists against national demands of the Palestinian people ".

are perhaps not aware ... Let them have a little time ...

Site PCF:" The hope raised by the Left Front. The national score obtained by the Left Front is 6.47% (6.17% in France) is a result in increase of 0.6 points compared to the 2004 European ".

The Communists, in their head Handlebar election. Should not blame them: when one is poor, there's crumbs ...

Site Party of Muslims of France: Ah Finally! It talks about Iran: "Iran - Crisis complex media simplistic" (sic).

Well, see ... In Gaza, in January 2009, the crisis was simple: the Jews Y'avait opposite ...

Site MRAP: Behind the bar codes, the Palestinian people is in prison. Boycott the products of oppression!

MRAP monomaniac? It's been almost nine years that the organization "anti-racist" (defense of laughter!) Stutters his own slogans binary and wants to deprive us of oranges and avocados.

Regarding the situation in Iran, hurry up anyway, "progressive" and "anti-racists" of France, the gossips will still say that you're interested in the misfortunes of this world that when Jews are around.

What people are evil anyway ...


Jean-Paul Belmont © Primo, June 21, 2009

* What our readers do not care: Primo is not mad. This is a parody inspired by the Portuguese Nobel laureate Jose Saramago, who asked in 2002, the equation: Ramallah = Auschwitz.

Notary Public Signature

in Tehran: A CALL TO SPEAK ON 24 June

Call to protest launched by the Community of Vitry-sur-Seine (chaired by Dr. David Ruach) with the support of the Council of Jewish Communities of the Val-de-Marne (CCJ 94) and of all Jewish institutions in the Ile-de-France. Information: 01 56 20 26 26 - 06 19 70 00 87 - Mail: ccjif@free.fr

Jeffrey Dahmer Antisocial

Face.com has implemented a facial recognition technology adopted by Facebook

Photo: "Tagged" team of Israel Face.com Sagie Maoz, Gil Hirsch, Yaniv Taigman.

Face.com is a young Israeli start-up that revolutionized social networking in particular with its facial recognition technology. Gil Hirsch, Yaniv Taigman, Eden Shochat and Moti Shniberg are the team that developed this tool that allows you to identify people in such an album or a photo without making mistakes.


After a year and a half of intense brainstorming and where the team held meetings, workshops and conferences by inviting such Sergey Brin, Google co-founder, the 4 talented Israelis launched their technology which allows facial recognition even with a poor image quality. After planning to focus on the security field, Face.com decided to focus on the niche with civil and social networks including Facebook in particular.
The stated goal of reaching and Face.com is to achieve a level of 90% accuracy by winning an experiment called "Faces in the Wild" by the media Computer Vision, University of Massachusetts.


The advantage of such technology also lies in its ease of installation, speed of execution for scanning and recognition, its relevance and use for free.
Note that since its launch Face.com 401 076 122 scanned photos, identified about 700 000 faces and 154 815 recorded confirmations tags .-


Anti-Israel Boycott Blog
Source: Article Yoni Abittan Israel @ Valley
http://www.israelvalley.com/news/2009/06/21/23216/israel-technologies-israel-start-up-face-com-a-mis-en-place-une-technologie- de-recognition and facial-adopted-by-facebook

Stop Xbox Live Subscription

Save contiguity: Area E-1 and the link Ma'ale Adumim to Jerusalem with

- Nadav Shraga

Area E-1 is part of Maale Adumim Israeli town adjacent to Jerusalem. This area has been designed to link Maale Adumim and its 36,000 inhabitants in the capital. Every prime minister since Yitzhak Rabin to date have supported this plan. The said zone an area of 12 hectares and is largely uninhabited lands belong to the state.
Israel remains concerned that the noose is tightening around the Palestinian construction. It threatens East Jerusalem. These constructs wild block development the city to the east, and undermines Israel's control over the Jerusalem-Jericho road. This main artery is of strategic importance, it helps in times of war, transporting troops and military equipment to the east and north of the country using the road to the Jordan Valley.
Contrary to some claims, the project E-1 fails to cut the West Bank in half and will not violate the Palestinian contiguity. Israel has planned a new route will allow the free movement of Palestinians from the south and would connect the northern cities. This bypass would reduce the transit time for drivers Palestinian travelers do not encounter more roadblocks.
Construction Israeli and Palestinian West Bank was governed by the legal terms of the Oslo II Interim Agreement of September 28, 1995. Area E-1 is located in Area C, that is to say under the control of the Israeli planning and urbanization. Therefore, on the ground, much of the Palestinian construction completed recently is illegal. Yet the Oslo agreements do not prevent Israeli settlements, but in recent years, Israel has preferred to undertake unilateral restrictions in this area.
In the development zone E-1, it is planned to build 3,500 units of housing, shopping area and a hotel. This plan has become a subject of international controversy and the U.S. support the Palestinian position and seek to freeze Israeli construction in expectation of a final peace agreement.
There is a consensus on Israel needs to link Maale Adumim to Jerusalem by the development of Area E-1.
13 years have elapsed since the preparation of this plan and in the meantime Bedouin tribes have established a thriving illegal Palestinian construction which reduced the available area of the zone, a corridor within a kilometer wide.
To consolidate the status of Jerusalem as the capital of Israel, all Israeli governments, both right and left, built around the city neighborhoods and bedroom communities: Maale Adumim to the east, Givat Zeev in the north, south Efrat located in the Etzion bloc south west and Beitar Jerusalem. Israel considers these satellite towns as part of metropolitan Jerusalem. All Israeli governments have designed these
settlement blocs, relatively close to the "green line", to save them and attach them one day, as part of a permanent peace agreement.
On April 13, 2004, former U.S. President, George W. Bush sent a letter about this to the Prime Minister at the time, Ariel Sharon. In the letter, Bush reiterated the U.S. position that any arrangement for Israeli-Palestinian final status should take into consideration the demographic reality that was created on the ground since the Six Day War. It states that it must be taken into account that Israel will fully withdraw from all West Bank areas.
Likewise, the security barrier that separates the West Bank has been drawn on the basis of the principle of integration of the main settlement blocs in Israeli territory. The Israeli Supreme Court of Justice affirmed this principle.


http://www.jcpa-lecape.org/ViewArticle.aspx?ArticleId=224

Cervix Is Closed And Hard Could I Be Pregnant

the Middle East, Christian dhimmitude kills.

Interview Bat Yeor

Original Italian: "Nel medio directs dhimmitudine if paga con cristiana la vita. Yeor Intervista a Bat, "Foglio, 17 June, page 3, as shown on the site Informazione Corretta.
French Translation: DE Guez



Rome. In aftermath of September 11, 2001, the worldwide television have broadcast a video of Al Qaeda propaganda. It shows a squad of terrorists who broke into a house, they walk on a standard black and trained to shoot against a target, this target is a Christian cross. Like, small, wooden, worn around the neck Ishtiaq Masih. Imagine that you are currently browsing the valley by bus Pakistani Punjab. The bus made a stop, you stop at an inn, you order a tea. Then you pay and the landlord notice that you wear a cross around your neck because you are one of many Pakistani Christians as Anglican bishop Michael Nazir-Ali. Some underlings Islamists tell you at the entrance of the room there is a sign that warns: "Here we serve only the Muslims." You have defiled a teacup, reserved for Muslims! They start hitting you with sticks and stones, you crave their pity, but you will die shortly afterwards as a result of your injuries. This happened to Ishtiaq.

11 years ago, on the occasion of the opening, the Vatican's Synod of Bishops for Asia, Joseph Coutts, bishop of Hyderabad, Pakistan, gave words of tragic Eastern Christians:

"The prevailing attitude in Muslim countries is to consider the Christians as 'dhimmis' traitors. Islam can not and should not be placed in the same category as Hinduism, Buddhism, Shintoism that. Islam is a politico-religious power with expansionist tendencies. "
few days before the speech by Coutts, bishop of Faisalabad, John Joseph, was shot in the head, a court in which a Christian accused of blasphemy had been sentenced to death.

Now, as then, the world ignored the plight Christians in Muslim countries. Today, their systematic persecution is accompanied by a silence and complicity on the part of the international community, activists of human rights, media and nongovernmental organizations. A few days after Pope Ratzinger's words on "a Palestinian state, militant Islamists have desecrated 70 graves of Palestinian Christians.

This happened in the village of Jiffna, near Ramallah, the stronghold of the Palestinian Authority Abu Mazen. Our Lady of Jiffna was vandalized in the head and hands, it is the symbol of what Benjamin Sleiman, Catholic Archbishop Baghdad has called "the extinction of Christianity in the Middle East."

Since the First World War, 10 million Christians have been forced to emigrate from the Middle East. And, as explained Monsignor Philippe Brizard, director general of Oeuvre d'Orient, the famous French organization dedicated to the Christians of the Middle East, "the radicalization of Islam is the main cause of the Christian exodus."

There was a time when the Palestinian Territories, lived 20% of Christians today they are more than 5%. In 1920, in Turkey, there were 2 million Christians, there are only a few thousand. At the beginning of last century, Christians made up one third of the Syrian population, today they are less than 10%. In 1932, Christians accounted for 55% of the Lebanese population, now they are below the threshold of 30%.

Iran crosses the phase of its most obscurantist relationship between Christianity and the Islamic revolution, begun in 1979, when Ayatollah Khomeini demanded the immediate closure of Christian schools and given a month to all foreigners to leave the religious the country. The Iranian parliament is about to pass a law that provides for the death penalty for a person born Muslim father who decides to convert.

Up on the frontispiece of "Ketob Ta'limate-e Dini", the instruction manual used by religious Christians can find the photo of Khomeini. The ethnic cleansing of indigenous peoples of the Middle East is underway. The diversity of the Middle East will be reduced to the flat monotony of a single religion, Islam, and a handful of idioms. Some of the victims murdered in Yemen on Monday belonged to an evangelical mission. After the attack of March against a group of South Koreans, Al Qaeda had explained very clearly in a statement:

"They bring corruption in our land and play a dangerous role in the spread of Christianity."

Meanwhile, the organization "International Christian Concern has reported finding the body of a young Pakistani Christian, who was found tortured in a canal in the region of Punjab. Litto and his name was in love with a Muslim girl. The brothers of the girl had forced him to convert to Islam. Litto refused. He was stabbed in the stomach and genitals. Meanwhile, in Karachi, a major Pakistani cities, a Christian child of 11, Irfan, got killed front of his church. It

Mario Rodriguez, director of the Pontifical Mission Societies in Pakistan, who revealed this, he appealed to the world:

"The Taliban roam, threatening, in Christian neighborhoods of Karachi, terrorizing Women and inviting people to convert to Islam or face death. "

In Quetta, a Pentecostal school was closed after a threat of suicide attack. A Banu Cantt, a historic church dedicated to St. George was attacked, Bibles burned, dismembered the cross and the altar destroyed. After their attacks against Christians, the guerrillas have left inscriptions on the walls of churches: "Taliban Zindabad", "Islam Zindabad" (long live the Taliban, long live Islam ") and" Christians Islam qabol karo "( "Christians do you convert to Islam").

Non-Muslims must pay a fee to the Taliban if they want to continue to live in their homes. The "jizya" imposed on Christians, Hindus and Sikhs, consists of an annual payment of 1000 rupees per head, just over eight euros are exempt women, children and the disabled. All members of minorities must the pay for the right to live, otherwise they are forced to abandon homes and villages in which they live forever. The last

Coptic girl abducted and forcibly converted to Islam called Nermeen Mitry. It was recovered the same day by his family, who had launched a search to find her. Nermeen was abducted in the village of El Mahalla by a Muslim, Hossam Hamouda, with the help of his aunt, Leila Attia. One hundred Islamists, armed with swords and sticks attacked the five members of the family of the girl and have left the village after the Copts have been forced to reconcile with the perpetrator of the abduction.

"For every blow they gave us, they sang: 'There is only one Allah. They pulled us out of our cars saying, 'get out, followers of the religion of the dog'!

Copts Christians are being killed in Hagaz on the bank of the Nile, while returning from church. This happened while at Cairo, near the village Coptic Barack Obama uttered his words ringing on mutual respect.

Cairo is that fled in 1955, Bat Ye'or, which in Hebrew means "daughter Nile. " She is the author of the bestselling book, Eurabia, edited by Lindau. She returns with an essay "The Universal Caliphate, still with the same publisher. It is the specialist "Dhimmitude" requiring non-Muslims in Islam. Oriana Fallaci has included in his writings the term "Eurabia" and gave it a global resonance.

"What dhimmitude? And why nobody talks about? These two issues are related to me, "says Bat Ye'or in Foglio.

"dhimmitude is part of jihad is obligatory theological, political and legal. The oppression and persecution of infidels, including Jews and Christians, is the just punishment reserved for the 'kuffar' (infidels) who refuse to acknowledge the truth of Islam. They are conquered peoples, victims of jihad, dispossessed of their history, their culture, their identity, their traditions, they lost their references, their history, like the Copts in Egypt. They feel inferior to Muslims, they are hunted down and this feeds their feelings of submission and inferiority, they become humble. It's a permanent feeling of vulnerability. For over a millennium, the jihad was the military and political force that has submitted and, in most cases, destroyed civilizations Zoroastrian, Christian, Buddhist and Indian in Africa, Europe and Asia. All these aspects have turned these people. If you are going to explain dhimmitude, they refute this view, they are afraid, they are conditioned by their inferiority. They do not pose a relationship of equality with Muslims. It is safe to say that the denial of the suffering of victims of jihad and Islamic imperialism is a form of racism that makes these persecuted human beings of a second category.

Why not talk about it does not? Because the Muslim world, represented by the Organization of the Conference Islamic, which is a kind of modern Caliphate, does not accept criticism of jihad, which is a perfect war, nor that of dhimmitude Because jihad, Sunnah, sharia, Islam is all perfect and do tolerate any criticism. The humiliation suffered by the dhimmi Christians and not be criticized. The West is afraid of the caliphate and lives in his shadow.

Dhimmitude is a story taboo in Europe. And as dhimmis, we end up being unable to help the Muslim world in the criticism of its policy towards non-Muslims. We are the ones forcing the Muslim world to continue on this path. One should not talk about dhimmitude. For years, I myself was boycotted because I wanted to talk about this story. But there are Muslims who thanked me for telling the history of dhimmitude.

There are those who, like Obama in Cairo, adopted an attitude toward the Muslim world, not to protect Christians, but for political, economic and tactics. Then there are Christians who live in the Muslim world, the survivors of the Arab world, who are afraid to put themselves in danger because these communities live in extreme vulnerability. Before publishing my writings, I asked permission from my Egyptian friends. I was ready not to publish them, I knew I could endanger them. They said if you do not write it, we are lost. "

Bat Ye'or says the current climate of hatred and persecution.

"Egypt keeps the law that punishes apostasy of the death penalty, Christians converted to Islam can not return to Christianity, those who denigrate Islam were arrested. The Copts, constantly apart, threatened, humiliated, are forced to abandon their ancient homeland, to build and repair churches, we need a permit, which is rarely granted, and Christians are often attacked, their shops are looted and women frequently often raped. Jews from Egypt who returned to places of tourist presence multimillennial are not even allowed to photograph the remains of their history.

The Baha'i religion is not recognized and its faithful are deprived of their rights. These laws derived millennia of Shari'a are applied, more or less strictly, in all Muslim countries in the world. The condition of dhimmitude has transformed peoples' free and majority in their country, creators of the finest civilizations and powerful of their time in minority amnesic survivors subjected to humiliation, insecurity and fear.

Colonization Muslim by his conquests, carried out the destruction of indigenous peoples and cultures, the reduction of people in slavery and has carried out evictions, expropriations, massacres, forced conversions, and dhimmitude, c that is to say a set of discriminatory and humiliating, not very different from subjugation. Today, the dynamics and ideology that gave the impetus for these changes are still active at all levels. And few people are able to distinguish among the changes currently underway in Europe, because they do not know history and mechanisms. Today, the history of dhimmitude, that is to say, analyzing the interconnections political, economic and social inevitably led people who are targets of jihad, the decadence and disintegration, is a story banned in Europe. This occultation is motivated by the refusal of Muslim countries to recognize that their story is one of imperialism, colonization, enslavement and oppression as recognized by historians of European States and the United States, out of respect for their past. It is therefore very important to have the courage to speak, otherwise, our turn will come to us Westerners, to be the next dhimmis.

This will be our punishment, because we have been insensitive to the suffering of our brothers. I believe in justice, if we are not generous to the history of persecution, our selfishness is punished. In Dubai there are 2,000 Christians from Gaza. Refugees to whom we will never mention the existence, just as the Jews exiled en masse from Arab countries.

Who knows the name of Rami Ayyad? He was the head of the only Christian bookshop in Gaza, linked to the Protestant organization, "Palestinian Bible Society. He was stabbed to death. The brothers had to win at San Porfirio Cemetery in a funeral procession without a cross. His wife Pauline wrote a beautiful letter, "to my sweet husband, Rami Ayyad martyr."




© Foglio


Published June 19, 2009, by Mr. Macina site upjf.org

Tvcenter Device Not Aviable

Silences Barack Hussein Obama




BARAK HUSSEIN OBAMA IS

PRO-PALESTINIAN Notepad: the silence of Barack Hussein Obama

By Ivan Rioufol Credible, Barack Hussein Obama? Its historical approximations, which are Islam, the religion of his father, as a source of Europe Lights and inventions such as printing, cast doubt of the seriousness of its analysis. Especially since he also says: "The United States is one of the largest Muslim country in the world." His recent promotion of the Islamic veil as a symbol of female submission, shocked defenders of secularism. The icon, a bit distant during his stay in Paris does not deserve the unanimous praise.
Obamania that lasts, especially within the French intelligentsia, obscures the basic critical thinking. Arguing that the president of the United States began to distance itself from its predecessor, any policy is praised by anti-Bushites yesterday. Even his glances to the Islamists and their extended hands with despots are considered exemplary of intelligence by those who believe that the West must force himself to humility. Have they forgotten, these heirs of Chamberlain, that totalitarianism despise the weak?

The coup of Mahmoud Ahmadinejad in Iran, which has just been re-elected handily in defrauding the polls, unveiled if need oppression of the Islamo-fascist regime, which built its bomb nuclear threat and Israel. The irrationality of its leaders, who expect the Apocalypse as an issue, makes more random any attempt at appeasement. It is therefore dismaying to observe the silence of Obama before this tyranny, which he dare not even name it for what it is.
Its policy of the outstretched hand is already a failure because it prevents to choose, by prudence, between the repression of the Illuminati and the aspiration of a people's sovereignty. As the crowd dared Iran, on Monday, defying the prohibitions and balls (seven deaths in Tehran), the president of the largest democracy refrains from taking sides, under the encouragement of his devotees. At least Obama does not get its act together, it is permissible to see cowardice in this attitude.

Moreover, more generally, the "soft power" made by Obama, in reply to lent warmongering neoconservatives and Bush, apparently does not shine by its effectiveness. Iran not only shines the most retrograde, threatening human rights and peace in the world, but North Korea is also stepping up its provocations in the nuclear arms race. Bush scored two regimes then in the "axis of evil". The facts show he was right.


Sarkozy saves honor
Barack H. Obama explains his restraint, stressing the little difference between Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and Mir Hossein Moussavi, who claims the election. But this relativism is cynical. Although the two men are from the same Islamic totalitarianism, which hates the U.S.. However, the challenge of fraud is also the policy of Ahmadinejad. That is a fight for democracy that encourages Iranians to protest to demand recognition of their votes. Tuesday, they were in the streets despite calls for calm Moussavi, who is thus far only a pretext. Many demonstrators were in sight of "fascist theocracy," as he designates. Leave them without any support? It was France

who saved the honor. Nicolas Sarkozy denounced on Tuesday, "the magnitude of the fraud, proportional to the violent reaction." On Wednesday, he drove home the point: "The idea of an opposition in Iran is an interesting perspective." Should that democracies do low profile on the pretext of not arouse the wrath of dictators? Number of obamaniaques think, without alarm of the spirit of capitulation that wins. While it is fashionable to admit to the West "a certain arrogance" (Dominique de Villepin, City of Men, Plon). Yet it is he who remains the reference for some of these young people angry who aspire to his lifestyle.

It is paradoxical to observe that taste for flagellation, common to European elites ready to note the decline of the West, while their civilization is still an ideal addition to the point of putting defeated Hezbollah during the recent Lebanese elections. When writing Villepin, speaking of secularism, it is "the foundation of the City of Men", does he not see that the threat of Europe by inviting at the same time, to "gather" as the Turkey and North Africa, where it is so poorly respected?


Courageous
Hear this appeal also thinking consistent with immigration to pay future pensions illustrates the persistent indifference of the state of society faces here and there, beyond the reach of process "cons-colonialism" (Renaud Camus ) (1). But eyes open. Mayor (PC) of Venissieux, Andre Gerin, supported this week by some sixty members, requires a national debate on the burqa (veil) which multiplies. Manuel Valls (PS) would like to add to his city (Evry) "some whites, some White, some Blancos" in the name of the fight against the ethnic ghettos. Francois Cope (UMP) dream him "a great debate on French identity," to avoid "that the nation continues to crack in silence." Policies would they brave?


(1) On this topic, also read dosssier enshrined this month, the magazine Controversies on "Post colonialism".

http://blog.lefigaro.fr/rioufol/2009/06/bloc-notes-les-silences-de-bar.html

3 D Appartement Extrem

Appeal June 18, 2009

By Yann

REEF
Network Against the Islamization of France

Appeal June 18, 2009 France lost the battle of the veil but she has not lost the war of secularism.
unconscious Governments have come to France for millions of Muslims. Islam is a religion very proselyte, population of Muslims is much higher than that of non-Muslims, and legal and illegal immigration is largely Muslim, so we see our country today Islamising.
Islam is the only one of the three monotheistic religions that has not made its aggiornamento secular. Islam is also a profound and lasting retrograde on minority rights, women's rights, secularism, freedom, apostasy, blasphemy, and many other hard-won rights of our civilization. This Islamization is the main source of a future civil war and the death of our country as we have known since 1500 years. That is why we must act while there is still time, against the Islamization of France.

The new appeal of 18 June addressed to all French people, whether believers or atheists, rich or poor, Muslim or not, to form the Network Against the Islamization of France (REEF).

June 6, 2009 a President of the Republic unconscious said the Islamic veil in France is acceptable when " emanates from the free choice "of the wearer. We consider this declaration of unconditional surrender in the battle of the veil opened the way for unlimited Islamization of our country. We call on all French people of good will to join us in this network, including Muslims, expelled from, or unable to do more of this barbaric religion, so that we define together how to stop the Islamization of the country, which does is in nobody's interest because France must remain in France.

Because a Muslim is now probably France. France because a Muslim is never desirable. Colombey-les-deux-Eglises never become Colombey-les-deux-Mosques, we make the oath.

Jean Robin
Publisher of The Mosque of Notre-Dame de Paris - Year 2048

Contact me: recif@gmail.com
http://www.bivouac-id.com/2009/06/18/appel- du 18-Jun-2009 /

Convertibles Bonds List

Obama puts pressure

Middle East. U.S. President wants to force Netanyahu, who dithers.

Nathalie Harel is the response of tit for tat. Since the center Begin-Sadat (BESA), University of Bar-Ilan Benjamin (Bibi) Netanyahu has delivered on Sunday 14 June, his reply to the speech in Cairo on June 4 Barack Obama.Après have refused to publicly discuss the principle of a future Palestinian state, he ended up sending a message as a "yes but".
Yes to the creation of a demilitarized Palestinian state, provided that the Palestinians recognize Israel as the state of the people juif.Non the sudden stop construction in existing settlements in the West Bank. Seen as a step forward from Washington, this address has angered the Palestinian Authority. She believes that Netanyahu "torpedo the peace efforts." Elements the most right-wing Israeli coalition denounced the "betrayal" of their champion.

It is true that for the first time endorsing the idea of a future Palestinian state, the Likud leader initially sought to allay the fears of the international community. On the eve of an Association Council EU-Israel supposed to discuss the enhancement of economic relations with Israel, Bibi favorite calming jeu.Échaudée by war in Gaza, the Union has threatened to freeze strengthening its ties with Israel in order to influence the recovery process Peace.
is first to stop the deterioration of relations with the United States, that Netanyahu has agreed to soften. Obama, as his special envoy to the Middle East George Mitchell, had repeatedly called for an immediate freeze of settlement in Cisjordanie.Cette requirement is even more untenable for Bibi would deprive it ipso facto support the religious right, the mainstay of her coalition. Should we speak of open crisis with


Washington? In Bibi's entourage, some think Obama is ready to go to the incident under the influence of his closest adviser Rahm Emanuel, Ancestry Israel to push its policy of reconciliation with the world arabe.D others prefer to see in the Cairo speech a mere change of style.

"Tensions exist with the White House, but it is too early to talk of crisis," said Gerald Steinberg, Besa Israeli think tank. In the short term, it does not believe the U.S. sanctions: "For years, both countries have avoided talking about sensitive subjects, such as colonization, we now have the opportunity to do so."

This US-Israeli relationship is based on fundamentals that are far from exclusively related to the conflict with Palestiniens.Ainsi, Israel enjoys a yearly windfall of U.S. $ 3 billion (three-quarters going to buy American military hardware)!

The two allies have been periods of more acute cold - as Nixon, Carter, Reagan and Bush - who never led to "dropping". "Neither the U.S. nor Israel has an interest in entering into a logic of confrontation, says Eytan Gilboa, Besa. Jerusalem has too need American support in the Iranian issue. "Nevertheless 63% of Israelis say they are wary of Obama's policies. This one is accused of not taking into account "the logic of refusal" that characterizes Hamas and Fatah. "Since 1967, Palestinians have had on several occasions, the opportunity to build their state, and never succeeded: Do they really want? wonders Oded Eran, the INSS (Institute for National Security Studies) in Tel Aviv. They may be more comfortable not having a state synonymous with responsibilities and commitments. "


http://www.valeursactuelles.com/public/valeurs-actuelles/html/fr/articles.php?article_id=4890

Ftv Midnight Hot Free Streams

Bibi "We must strengthen the Jewish presence in Judea and Samaria "

Soldiers dismantle an outpost not authorized by us. Photo: AP JPost Tovah Lazaroff

By Group Loyal to Israel, an organization of Zionist religious right, has announced plans to build 30 new outposts in Judea and Samaria in response to the speech of Binyamin Netanyahu.

Daniela Weiss, former mayor of Kedumim and one of the leaders of the group, told the Jerusalem Post that his group was recruiting activists for the summer construction of outposts. These should be erected between the towns of Ofrah and Shiloh, in Gush Etzion, near Hebron and settlements of Elon Moreh and Bracha.

The organization has built and rebuilt eight outposts during the past two years after many of them had been dismantled by security forces.
More recently, eight structures in the outpost of Maoz Esther have been almost completely rebuilt since its dismantling in early.
Weiss explains that the decision to renew efforts to build is a response to Netanyahu's speech, in which he supported the creation of a Palestinian state. "We must strengthen the Jewish hold on Judea and Samaria," she added.


% 2FJPArticle% 2FShowFull http://fr.jpost.com/servlet/Satellite?cid=1245184852605&pagename=JFrench